Kim Kardashian HITS BACK at lawsuit over SKKN trademark

Date:


Kim Kardashian hits again over SKKN skincare trademark lawsuit as her authorized crew SLAM small enterprise proprietor for attempting to ‘leverage a settlement by threatening to hurt her title and repute’

  • Kim Kardashian’s lawyer has hit again at a trademark lawsuit over her SKKN line
  • Brooklyn-based small enterprise proprietor Cydnie Lunsford claims Kim copied her
  • Lunsford has used the equally named SKKN+ model title since July 2017
  • Nevertheless, Kim’s lawyer has slammed the go well with as attempting to leverage a settlement 

Kim Kardashian and her lawyer are hitting again over claims that her skincare line SKKN BY KIM is a trademark infringement of the equally named model SKKN+ utilized by small enterprise proprietor Cydnie Lunsford. 

Attorneys for Lunsford first served Kardashian, 41, with a cease-and-desist letter final July, claiming that her Brooklyn-based firm Magnificence Ideas LLC has supplied salon and skincare companies below the title SKKN+ since July 2017. 

Nevertheless, an announcement from Kardashian’s lead lawyer Michael Rhodes to DailyMail.com on Tuesday calls it nothing greater than a ‘shakedown effort’ from Ms. Lunsford and authorized crew to ‘injury her title and repute’ and leverage a big settlement. 

Below hearth: Kim Kardashian has hit again at a lawsuit over her SKKN skincare line trademark as her crew say ‘we have finished nothing incorrect’ 

Lunsford and her authorized crew have accused Kardashian of attempting to make use of her movie star to bully a small enterprise for the rights to make use of the trademark, TMZ reviews.

Magnificence Ideas states that it’s a ‘Black and woman-owned enterprise’ the survived the pandemic and opened a retailer ‘solely to study [Kim Kardashian] was launching her new model with a strikingly related title,’ per the report. 

They declare of their docs that after allegedly reaching out to Kardashian, they have been ignored by her crew who pushed forward with the SKKN launch.

Kim Kardashian lawyer Michael Rhodes’ response in full 

This lawsuit will not be what it appears. SKKN BY KIM is a brand new model that follows within the footsteps of Ms. Kardashian’s profitable KKW line of merchandise. Constructing on impartial analysis and improvement, her firm filed a trademark software for SKKN BY KIM to guard the brand new branded merchandise. This prompted the present shakedown effort.

Mid-last yr, we obtained a letter from Magnificence Ideas, an esthetician studio in Brooklyn owned by Ms. Lunsford. We applaud Ms. Lunsford for being a small enterprise proprietor and following her goals. However that doesn’t give her the proper to wrongfully declare that we have finished one thing incorrect. In its letter, Magnificence Ideas claimed to personal rights to a emblem made up of SKKN+, and had simply filed for trademark safety for that emblem. The enterprise was a one-person store providing facials from a single Brooklyn location. The salon had no signage and was by appointment solely. To our information, Magnificence Ideas offered no merchandise below the SKKN+ title.

Magnificence Ideas requested that we drop the SKKN title. In fact we stated no. Magnificence Ideas then challenged Ms. Kardashian’s trademark functions on the USPTO. Unsurprisingly, the USPTO rejected Magnificence Ideas’ personal SKKN+ mark saying that “skkn” simply means “pores and skin.” Undaunted, Magnificence Ideas then tried to make its enterprise appear greater than it was – it leased a brand new storefront, modified its web site, and so forth.

A number of occasions we reached out to Magnificence Ideas, looking for a wise path to coexistence. We identified that operating a small esthetician enterprise in Brooklyn doesn’t give it the proper to close down a world skincare line. We found that Magnificence Ideas was doing enterprise at one level with out the legally required licenses. In the long run, Magnificence Ideas didn’t actually interact with us past demanding some huge cash.

Since we have finished nothing incorrect, we stood our floor. We expect the case is much less in regards to the regulation of logos and extra about attempting to leverage a settlement by threatening to hurt Ms. Kardashian’s title and repute. That is not going to work and we sit up for presenting our case in court docket.

 

However in response, Kardashian’s lawyer Rhodes  – who defended the household within the latest Blac Chyna case – declare they did attempt to interact with Ms. Lunsford and Magnificence Ideas LLC to come back to an settlement. 

‘We applaud Ms. Lunsford for being a small enterprise proprietor and following her goals,’ it says, partially, in Rhodes’ response. ‘However that doesn’t give her the proper to wrongfully declare that we’ve finished one thing incorrect.’

Rhodes later added: ‘A number of occasions we reached out to Magnificence Ideas, looking for a wise path to coexistence. We identified that operating a small esthetician enterprise in Brooklyn doesn’t give it the proper to close down a world skincare line.’ 

Claims: Cydnie Lunsford (pictured) and Beauty Concepts LLC issued Kim Kardashian with a cease-and-desist letter last year

Claims: Cydnie Lunsford (pictured) and Magnificence Ideas LLC issued Kim Kardashian with a cease-and-desist letter final yr

Similar: Above is the SKKN+ logo that is purported to be used by Lunsford

Related: Above is the SKKN+ emblem that’s purported for use by Lunsford 

Within the authentic cease-and-desist letter that was obtained by TMZ, Magnificence Ideas claimed that it operates a web site and social media account utilizing the identical block letters as Kardashian’s model, and that it utilized to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Workplace again in March to register the SKKN+ emblem.

The corporate harassed that it had put loads of effort and time into constructing their model over the previous three years, and have been now involved that Kardashian’s model would trigger confusion within the market. 

On the time, Kardashian’s lawyer responded to TMZ saying: ‘We actually admire and help small companies, and our hat is off to Ms. Lunsford. However the query at hand is certainly one of trademark regulation and we’ve not finished something deserving of authorized motion by her.’ 

New release: Earlier this month, Kardashian went on a publicity blitz to launch her new skincare line SKKN (Pictured above)

New launch: Earlier this month, Kardashian went on a publicity blitz to launch her new skincare line SKKN (Pictured above) 

Including: ‘We’re disillusioned that she has chosen to run to the media figuring out that we have been scheduling a name for tomorrow, requested by her lawyer. So whereas disagreeing with the letter, we’re hopeful that we are able to easy issues over as soon as either side communicate.’ 

Earlier this month, Kardashian went on a publicity blitz to launch her new skincare line SKKN and broke down easy methods to use the merchandise – admitting the entire system makes use of 9 merchandise value a complete of $630. 

It is not the primary controversy that Kardashian has confronted over the road, after followers accused her of ‘copying’ Lori Harvey’s skincare line which is known as SKN. 

Brand: Kim launched her SKKN line earlier this year

Model: Kim launched her SKKN line earlier this yr 

Commercial

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related