COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — International Points

Date:


Creator and Web page info

  • by Anup Shah
  • This web page Created

On this web page:

  1. Introduction
  2. Assembly final result
  3. Mainstream media reporting
  4. In context: widespread however differentiated duties
  5. Extra info
  6. Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, often known as the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to prime

Assembly final result

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse gasoline emissions. Often known as the Lima Accord, this treaty just isn’t legally binding and international locations should not have to specify how a lot they may in the reduction of, as a substitute agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it appeared like a profitable final result, others had been dissatisfied, equivalent to poor international locations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who had been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and harm commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful facets of the assembly final result, noting

  1. The brand new settlement doesn’t mirror the urgency of the local weather disaster
  2. Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
  3. Least developed and susceptible nations neglected within the chilly
  4. Divestment (from fossil gas reliance) is extra necessary than ever
  5. International momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In attempting to place a constructive spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, Ultimately, a worldwide local weather treaty is only one software to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to come back from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s international locations comes collectively to debate this disaster and persons are placing in huge efforts to ensure Paris [the next global meeting] received’t be like Copenhagen which was stuffed with disappointments regardless of huge guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s International Local weather and Vitality Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly final result saying that political expediency received over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to elucidate how they may ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of essentially the most susceptible international locations, they fully eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and harm’.

Again to prime

Mainstream media reporting

As with nearly each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this world subject. The place the assembly was reported it was typically in direction of the tip, and simply sound chew sort summaries saying all international locations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a significant enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing widespread however differentiated duties the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has sometimes failed to offer clarification and context of this precept that has been an necessary a part of these talks for over 2 many years; that poor and growing international locations shouldn’t bear the identical duties because the developed ones (as a result of they don’t seem to be the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier many years which have led to this, which is detailed rather more on this website’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in direction of this precept could have been introduced as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, reasonably then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from widespread reporting. Others included points on financing, know-how assist for poorer nations, and so on. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy international locations have stalled on this stuff or actively averted attempting to share know-how and so on, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is made from mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations annually, it may be simple to come back away with the impression that this assembly had a constructive final result.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! reveals, there have been plenty of necessary problems with rivalry:

Emissions-Slicing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to prime

In context: widespread however differentiated duties

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from at present’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the principle greenhouse gasoline — stays within the environment for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling essentially the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would due to this fact be completely different for these teams of nations — the widespread however differentiated duties precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and harm has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy international locations are eager to eliminate .

The years of resistance on this subject (and lots of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the dearth of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this facet, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their huge greenhouse emissions lately, in comparison with the far larger quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this website’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this website has mentioned for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s finally — and disproportionately — paid for the by the growing nations. New Delhi primarily based Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Customary, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There is no such thing as a motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be executed by the developed international locations. They [rich nations] principally have simply mentioned at Lima that we aren’t going to do any greater than what we’re doing thus far, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different growing international locations need to share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in dangerous religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Slicing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to prime

Extra info

Because the convention remains to be underway as this web page is written, extra info will probably be added right here after the occasion is over.

For extra concerning the points from different organizations, listed here are some beginning factors:

Again to prime

Information tales from IPS

Under is a listing of tales from Inter Press Service associated to the Lima local weather convention and its aftermath.

  1. Local weather change: Extra fossil gas funding, simply ‘delusional’, warns Guterres