It’s nonetheless inconclusive who fired the missile that landed in Poland on Tuesday and killed two folks, nevertheless it has not stopped world leaders, analysts, and self-proclaimed Twitter specialists leaping the gun and hypothesising whodunnit.
“Typically they get a person arms ID proper, however the context is mistaken — and that’s typically the place the hurt lies,” arms and munitions intelligence specialist N R Jenzen-Jones advised Crikey.
“There’s lots of people on the market simply competent sufficient to be harmful.”
The results of a quick-to-blame recreation in weapons identification might be lethal. This week NATO allies toyed with the prospect of an all-in battle as leaders entertained the “unlikely” concept that the strike was an act of Russian aggression and the extra possible situation that it was the work of an awry Ukrainian air defence missile responding to a Russian provocation.
Join a FREE 21-day trial and get Crikey straight to your inbox
Each Russia and Ukraine have denied possession of the missile. Putin ally and former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev mentioned the West was angling for WWIII; US President Joe Biden drip-fed intelligence with speak of trajectories; NATO’s secretary basic Jens Stoltenberg absolved Ukraine of wrongdoing even when the missile had a Ukrainian ID; and Polish President Andrzej Duda known as for evidence-based calm.
In the meantime, an intensive investigation into the incident is underway. Not solely will it put a reputation to the missile, however it should set up trigger and context. Briefly: who, how, why.
So what’s the right strategy of ID-ing a weapon and bringing its backstory to life?
“In the end, when analysing a selected incident, the investigator is making an attempt to attract a transparent line between the man who picked up the telephone or radio and gave an order, and the hurt that was inflicted on the different finish,” Jenzen-Jones mentioned.
There’s intel accessible each pre- and post-blast. Pre-blast provides the vital context (goal location, navy exercise, and arsenal within the space), whereas post-blast offers bodily proof (injury to buildings, craters, casualties, and munition remnants on the bottom and in people).
“You’re asking questions on why somebody would assault that web site, whether or not or not what you’re seeing is an intentional act, what the decision-making course of is likely to be,” he mentioned.
So the place to start selecting up the items?
Jenzen-Jones mentioned you go huge earlier than you go small. First step is to pick a “class” — a alternative between small weapons, mild weapons, heavy weapons, and munitions.
Inside these 4 killer classes are “teams”. The investigators deploy a divide-and-conquer technique based mostly on the aesthetic of the arms. For what it’s price, a “lengthy gun” is separated (at a protected distance) from a “hand gun”.
Then comes “kind”, which is an extra fragmentation of components based on perform. The ultimate section of “classification” is “methodology of operation”, which is in the end how a machine is managed by its grasp.
That’s the PID (optimistic ID) half. As a way to get a UID (distinctive ID) on a weapon, “make and mannequin” are key. That is the missile equal of a Ford Taurus. Batch, lot, and serial quantity mixed with bodily traits together with device marks, geometric patterns, stripes, and engravings are all tell-tale indicators.
“When a make, mannequin identify, or different key data is written on the weapon it’s very simple,” mentioned Jenzen-Jones, including that it’s “very unusual, however not exceptional” to seek out “sanitised” (de-identified) or counterfeit weapons.
Why? Producers aren’t typically making merchandise for the needs of guerrilla warfare, sources are scarce in battle so nations draw on no matter they’ve at their disposal, and there are sadly “few penalties if you happen to do get caught”.
However extra typically, injury to the weapon upon affect renders it tough to determine, deforming distinctive shapes and obliterating markings. And so it’s over to the sphere of forensics. Buried within the positive print are traits like alternative of font and chemical composition of paint.
The method of identification within the Polish case needs to be “comparatively simple”, mentioned Jenzen-Jones, as a result of it’s a “single munition incident”. Usually blast websites are bombarded with an array of arms, making it tough to disaggregate what’s what and who’s who. Much more so when chemical weapons are concerned.
However all of that is contingent on context. And for that, the complete image is vital. It’s the distinction, mentioned Jenzen-Jones, between a “regrettable accident, a negligent mistake, or a deliberate assault”.
