Competition Bureau needs to do some ‘soul-searching’ after Rogers-Shaw

Article content material

Canada’s Competitors Bureau must do some “soul-searching” after its failed effort to dam the $26-billion merger of Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc., in response to a contest lawyer who adopted the battle intently.

Article content material

Michael Osborne, chair of the Canadian competitors apply at legislation agency Cozen O’Connor LLP, mentioned the Bureau’s case was soundly dismissed by each the Competitors Tribunal that heard the preliminary problem and the federal courtroom that heard the watchdog’s attraction.

Article content material

“The Federal Courtroom of Enchantment rejected each argument put forth by the Commissioner,” Osborne mentioned.

The courtroom additionally confirmed the Tribunal’s discovering {that a} modified merger concerned the divestment of Freedom Cellular to Quebecor’s Videotron would really improve competitors, and supported its choice to have a look at that deal and never what the courtroom known as the “foray into fiction and fantasy” urged by the Commissioner.

“Shut, this case, was not,” Justice David Stratas informed the courtroom, noting that delaying the transaction may really trigger a deal that’s “pro-competitive and within the public curiosity, to die.”

Article content material

In a press release relating to the dismissal of his attraction, Commissioner of Competitors Matthew Boswell mentioned his Bureau was “actually dissatisfied” and continued to disagree with the findings. Regardless of this, the Bureau mentioned it accepted the appeals courtroom’s choice and wouldn’t be pursuing an additional attraction.

“We are going to by no means compromise in our efforts to guard and promote competitors for the good thing about Canadians,” Boswell mentioned.

Osborne mentioned the pace with which the appeals courtroom dismissed the case was common, however that it was however a rebuke.

“It’s a little bit of a slap within the face to the Commissioner as a result of it mainly says, ‘Buddy, you didn’t even get to first base on this deal.’”

“They need to maybe perform a little little bit of soul looking out about how they’ve been creating their circumstances,” Osborne mentioned, noting the company additionally just lately misplaced its problem of the acquisition of a main grain elevator in Manitoba.

Article content material

The Bureau’s consecutive losses on the Rogers-Shaw file come as Canada’s competitors guidelines face criticism from lay Canadians and coverage consultants, together with the federal competitors watchdog himself.

Osborne mentioned regardless of these losses, the Competitors Bureau nonetheless continues to do what it does and is profitable yearly in acquiring treatments from merging events the place the mergers do trigger points.

He famous that Canadians shouldn’t lose sight of the truth that the Bureau opinions round 200 mergers a yr, whereby 90 per cent don’t pose any challenge and are completed being reviewed inside two weeks.

Article content material

“The truth that the Bureau has received all however one problem within the tribunal doesn’t imply that they’re not good at doing this work,” he added, saying this implies the antitrust bureau has been profitable in settling the circumstances the place they had been going to win and lose circumstances the place they weren’t going to win and the events had been prepared to problem them.

The destiny of the proposed $26-billion merger is now within the fingers of federal trade minister François-Philippe Champagne.

Osborne mentioned Innovation, Science and Financial Improvement Canada (ISED), led by Champagne, now has no selection however to approve the spectrum switch.

“It’s not his enterprise to second-guess the Competitors Tribunal’s discovering that the modified merger can be good for competitors.”

• Electronic mail: dpaglinawan@postmedia.com | Twitter: denisepglnwn